Individual switching story from Cursor to Amp. Praises deep code intelligence and sub-agent architecture. Anecdotal, not systematic evidence.
Amp (Amp Inc.)
activeAmp Inc.'s CLI coding agent — independent spin-out from Sourcegraph (March 2026). Sub-agent architecture (Oracle, Librarian, Painter) built on Sourcegraph code intelligence DNA. 36,981 npm weekly downloads. Free tier + BYOK. Note: original sourcegraph/amp GitHub repo now 404s.
28/100
Trust
N/A
Stars
2
Evidence
Product screenshot

Videos
Reviews, tutorials, and comparisons from the community.
How to Build Vertical AI Businesses Fast with Ryan Carson, Builder in Residence at Sourcegraph
GPT 5.4 LIVE Test & Learn to Code in 2026: What's Essential vs. What AI Handles Now
Editorial verdict
Watch — corporate spin-out from Sourcegraph to independent Amp Inc. (March 2026) is a material change. The original sourcegraph/amp GitHub link returns 404. Tool still ships (36K npm downloads/week) under ampcode.com. Sub-agent architecture (Oracle, Librarian, Painter) remains the most sophisticated in the category. Update or verify all links before recommending.
Source
Public evidence
Strategic bet on CLI-only. Sub-agents (Oracle, Librarian, Painter) for deep code intelligence. Free tier and BYOK/pay-as-you-go pricing replaces $59/user/mo.
How does this compare?
See side-by-side metrics against other skills in the same category.
Where it wins
Sub-agent architecture: Oracle (code analysis), Librarian (external libraries), Painter (code review) — most sophisticated in category
Sourcegraph code intelligence DNA — deep codebase search and code graph
Available across terminal, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains, Neovim
Free tier + BYOK/pay-as-you-go — pricing improved from $59/user/mo
Deep Mode for autonomous research + extended reasoning
36,981 npm weekly downloads — real adoption signal
Where to be skeptical
Closed source — all threads stored on Sourcegraph servers, independent verification impossible
No published SWE-bench Pro or Terminal-Bench benchmark scores
CLI-only pivot (editor extension self-destructed March 5) — unproven at scale
Real switching stories are individual anecdotes, not systematic evidence
HN engagement (90 pts) is 24x lower than Claude Code
Ranking in categories
Know a better alternative?
Submit evidence and we'll run the full pipeline.
Similar skills
Aider
91Open-source AI pair programming CLI. The only tool in the coding CLI category with a fully verifiable, independent download number: 191,828/week PyPI installs, 5.7M lifetime, 15B tokens/week (homepage stat). Multi-model, git-native, no vendor lock-in. v0.86.2 released 2026-02-12.
Claude Code
90Anthropic's official agentic coding CLI. Terminal-native, tool-use-driven, with deep file system and shell access. #1 SWE-bench Pro standardized (45.89%), ~4% of GitHub public commits (SemiAnalysis), $2.5B annualized revenue (fastest enterprise SaaS to $1B ARR). 8M+ npm weekly downloads. Opus 4.6 with 1M context.
OpenHands
88Category leader in multi-agent orchestration — 69,352 stars (verified), $18.8M Series A, AMD hardware partnership, 455 contributors, 1M downloads/month PyPI (3.4M all-time). SWE-Bench Verified 72% with Claude 4.5 Extended Thinking (updated 2026-03-19), Multi-SWE-Bench #1 across 8 languages. Gap to #2 is enormous on every axis.

Gemini CLI
86Google's open-source terminal agent with Gemini 3 models, 1M token context, built-in Google Search grounding, and the best free tier in the category (1K req/day). 97.9K stars, 444 contributors. SWE-bench Pro standardized 43.30% (#2 behind Claude Code).
Raw GitHub source
GitHub README could not be fetched right now.